Habeas Corpus

---

  In God’s time, justice will stand where injustice once ruled 

  There’s still one path left — the truth.
The doors of justice don’t stay closed forever 

 Federal habeas corpus is not a retrial. It is federal review of whether a state conviction violated the Constitution.

Jason Dewayne Green has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court. The petition asks whether his constitutional rights were violated during his state proceedings.

Current Federal Status

• On November 1, 2024, Jason Green filed a federal habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

• On December 23, 2025, the district court denied the petition and declined to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
• Jason then sought a Certificate of Appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. 

• On July 16, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit denied that request.
• Counsel is reviewing whether any further legal procedure remains available.

• The federal courts did not conduct a new trial or independently reconsider the complete factual record. Their rulings were governed by the restrictive standards that apply to federal habeas review.   

• The central constitutional concerns remain documented in the indictment, trial transcript, jury instructions, appellate filings, and postconviction record. Those materials are available throughout this website for public review. 

 Federal Habeas Counsel:

Jason is represented in federal habeas proceedings by Douglas Johnson, Attorney at Law, Naperville, Illinois.

Federal habeas litigation is a specialized area of constitutional law involving strict procedural standards and federal review of state court convictions.

 This chart shows the basic path a state criminal case can take from trial, to direct appeal, to post-conviction review, and then into federal habeas review. It helps explain where Jason’s case fits and why federal review comes later, after state remedies have been exhausted.  

 A direct appeal is the first appeal after conviction and sentencing. It reviews the trial record for legal errors, such as improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, or other issues that appear in the record. It is not a new trial. 

Post-conviction review is a later challenge to the conviction after the direct appeal is over. In Alabama, this usually involves a Rule 32 petition. These claims often include constitutional violations, ineffective assistance of counsel, or other issues not fully resolved on direct appeal. 

 Federal habeas review is not a second trial or a full do-over. It is a limited federal review of whether the state conviction violated federal constitutional rights. Before a federal habeas appeal can move forward in the court of appeals, a Certificate of Appealability, or COA, is usually required. 

 Jason’s federal habeas petition has been denied, and the Eleventh Circuit declined to allow the appeal to proceed. Counsel is reviewing whether any further legal procedure remains available.